Court Date Today,
Does it Matter?

This morning the gang meets yet again down by Robson Square to engage, yet again in the Kabuki Theatre we've come to expect from time to time as justice continues to be frozen, obstructed or just plain forgotten in what is known as the Basi-Virk Trial, or perhaps more appropriately the BC Rail Trial. As we watch the world economy collapse, while to the south the criminal organization known as the Bu$h Administration tries to help their cronies steal everything left, that they haven't stolen already, it is hard not to notice the same thing occurring here much closer to home.

The Campbell government continues to drag its feet on disclosure while hiding behind StoneWally's immortal tape loop - "It's before the Courts." Meanwhile the looting of what used to be the assets of the people of British Columbia continues behind the scenes, unabated, indeed perhaps accelerated by the realization of the crooks on every level that the game is almost up. BC Rail, BC Hydro, every watercourse in the province, formerly productive and job providing forest lands being converted to speculative recreational developments to benefit the "right" people - pretty well everything in our province is for sale, cheap, if you know the right folks, or so it would appear.

Even Bill Tieleman and his few colleagues in the so-called media who even pay attention, can hardly keep count of the numerous ongoing investigations into lobbyists, cabinet ministers and other sordid affairs directly connected to the suspects that ever so rarely actually show up in the fancy digs where they are supposed to conduct the people's business down there in James Bay. They won't convene the legislature, because (they say) there is no business to conduct - everything is going soooooooo well. I guess maybe things are going well in the back rooms, but not so much in the kitchens and dining rooms of many other British Columbians. Meanwhile the "Loyal" Opposition under Carole "don't rock the boat" James can only seem to oppose the phoney Campbell Green Plan, thereby putting them firmly in bed with Steven Harper and Gary Lunn(khead). Where is it that the so-called Loyal Opposition's loyalities actually lie? Now there is a word that seems appropriate when referring to politics - LIE!

This morning back east in Montreal our Mob Chieftan Gordon Campbell is touting TILMA as the tool to save western Canada from the economic Karma raining down on the world after decades of Golden Showers Economic Theory, or trickle down, pillaging the planet. Can anybody say DISASTER CAPITALISM? Everybody is already stunned enough to send Sweater Vest Boy Steve back to Ottawa with an increased majority, the best time to shove policies down the throats of the uninformed and barely concious. I fear that by the time enough folks wake up Alberta and BC will both be hollowed out, evironmentally ravaged shells full of really hungry and angry people fighting among themselves for their next meal and looking for a drink of non-toxic water. Meanwhile the crooks will be ensconced, comfortably cushioned by their piles of ill-gotten gains, agonizing over the difficult decision of whether to have a Piña Colada or a Mai-Tai.

I would recommend that those who are interested, while they are waiting for whatever B.S. may spew from 800 Smithe Street today, go back to Bill Tieleman's Tyee article from June 5, 2007. This piece, written almost a year and a half ago, provides some context, especially because, as BC Mary points out in her court date notice this morning, that Application for disclosure of February 26, 2007, a key issue in Bill's article, is on the agenda for today's performance in Studio 54, or which ever set they are using today in the Hall of Mirrors Justice. On Monday of that week in June 2007, Justice Bennett was really annoyed at the RCMP, the Special Prosecutor and the Government and demanded that they comply with the February disclosure "orders" forthwith!

"In terms of police notes, I make the following order: Every police officer or civilian who touched or spoke about this investigation, regardless of what branch of the investigation they were involved in and regardless of rank or role undertaken will review every piece of paper he or she has and ensure it is submitted to the Crown forthwith. This includes but is not limited to notes, briefing notes, continuation reports, e-mail and anything marked 'not for disclosure'," Bennett wrote.

I guess the question we need to ask is just how promptly the word "forthwith" is meant to express. I wouldn't have thought it would refer to a time period measured in years. Somehow I doubt if I would have more than say thirty days to comply with a court order from the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Then again, I'm not part of the supreme group of British Columbians and don't hang out with, or donate to, the right crowd.

Update:

It seems that I could almost have written today's report this morning, as once again little (or nothing) occurred of any importance. The only correction according to an early report from BC Mary is the note that today's Kabuki performance took place in Studio 67. The only other news to report, or all that apparently happened was:

The Crown presented a single sheet of scheduling for times into late November when materials will be (?) placed in the hands of Defence and Defence will respond.

Other than this order or notice, or stall, the only other possibly significant information is the next scheduled court appearances, or as Mary's post concludes:

For those with the stomach, the next court sitting is on November 17 or 19th. Chatter at the edges of the arena suggests the trial could happen anytime - AFTER the next B.C. Election. As the road signs say all over B.C. - "EXPECT DELAYS". And as British Columbians are becoming aware, more and more - justice delayed is justice denied.

I guess the only lesson we can gain from today's performance is that the length of time described by the term "forthwith" is at least damn near two years, at least! I have to go to the store now, FORTHWITH, but I actually mean this afternoon!

No Leash Law for
Lobbyists

Or: Lobbying Ain't Lobbying
...........................When Liberals Do It!

Back in the beginning of Capo Campbell's ongoing crime spree against the citizens of British Columbia, before the Campbell mob learned to avoid holding sessions (and risk having to answer embarrassing or incriminating questions) in the Rock Palace in James Bay, the BC Liar's party promptly enacted Bill 20 - the Lobbyists Registration Act. After all, they had campaigned promising to provide British Columbians with open, transparent and accountable governance. Now, over seven years later, it has become obvious that this act does nothing in this regard, or more accurately almost nothing at all.

When Ken Dobell, in spite of his protestations of innocence, was found to be in violation of the act for his multi-hat wearing, job juggling performance as a tax payer funded adviser to the Premier while simultaneously being paid by the Sam 'I AM' Sullivan led city of Vancouver to lobby that same Premier and cabinet - some folks felt that having to return Vancouver's money AND write an essay felt short of being even a 'slap on the wrist.'

This week we have Patrick Kinsella, whose lawyers have written* to the Registrar of Lobbyists to inform him that their client will not co-operate with any investigation arising from his office into allegations that he has violated the act. It would appear that the only job of the registrar is to provide a pen and open the registry for the trough feeding lobbyist who actually considers what he/she does lobbying (B.C. Liberal's work for payday loan firm wasn't lobbying, company says - Globe & Mail) and not say - consulting. According to Liberal organizer won't co-operate with probe in today's Times-Colonist:

...Kinsella was refusing to consent to any resulting investigation because he believes the registrar "has no legislative or other power to ... conduct any investigation. - bolding - kc

Ken Dobell did co-operate with the registrar's investigation and look what it got for him; I mean those meanies made him write an essay, for gawd's sake

So we are left with two questions to ponder. First, is the Office of the Registrar of Lobbyists mostly a ceremonial title with an undoubtably handsome compensation plan? And second, will Leonard Krog, NDP Justice Critic (a position Sisyphus would have found more frustrating than his rock moving task) now ask the RCMP to investigate these allegations. According to the same Globe & Mail article:

The NDP says it will go to the RCMP with complaints about alleged lobbying activities by Mr. Kinsella after his lawyers refused to co-operate with the province's lobbying watchdog.

...../snip
Mr. Krog, who has called for the law to be strengthened, says he has no choice but to provide the RCMP with the same information he forwarded to the lobby watchdog and let them decide whether to investigate.

Of course as we have seen in the aftermath of the Legislature Raids, the RCMP seem to have a desk drawer full of waivers for any potential criminal activity that appears to involve members of the Campbell Mob.

This isn't a New Issue

Whatever it is that Mr. Kinsella actually does (lobbying, consulting, public service), it is clear that he knows how government works. The CBC reported in August of 2002 that the B.C. Libs deny they're selling access to government.

The British Columbia Liberal party is making no apologies for a fundraising letter suggesting $10,000 will get the "undivided attention" of key cabinet ministers.

The letter went out to major public relations firms in Vancouver inviting them to a luncheon. But when news of the letter's contents got out, the luncheon was cancelled.

It was supposed to take place at a restaurant in one of the city's exclusive waterfront hotels.

B.C. Liberal party fundraiser Patrick Kinsella and about a dozen principals from Vancouver's biggest PR firms were scheduled to attend.

But the lunch was called off after CBC News obtained a copy of the letter that accompanied the invitation.

The letter, from Kinsella, tells PR firms the communications sector hasn't paid its share. It suggests a $10,000 cheque would demonstrate the firms' support for the government

It also suggests the $10,000 could buy an intimate lunch or dinner with a key cabinet minister for important clients.

B.C. Liberal party executive director Kelly Reichert denies accusations the party is selling access to the government. "We've been very clear to all the people that seek donations, and all the people that give donations, that all they should expect to get from that is that they're going to get better government."

Does this mean since I can't afford to give $10,000 of tribute to the Campbell Mob, I can only expect mediocre government, when it comes to my concerns? I have to admit that that's how it sounds to this cowboy.

This all happened back when Joy MacPhail led the two woman unofficial opposition, which many, including myself, still feel was more effective than today's much more numerous Carole James led Official Opposition. In her inimitable style Joy had this to say about the canceled luncheon and the Liberal excuses/explanations.

It's sort of like when someone says, 'You know it's not about the money,' you know it's about the money. And when someone goes and says, 'It's not about access,' you know darn well it's about access.

* Click below:
for Correspondence between Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP and the Registrar of Lobbyists


Correspondence published by Sean Holman at Public Policy Online.

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Barristers & Solicitors
Patent & Trade-mark Agents
595 Burrard Street, P.O. Box 49314
Suite 2600, Three Bentall Centre
Vancouver BC V7X 1L3 Canada
Tel: 604-631-3300 Fax: 604-631-3309

September 3, 2008

VIA E-MAIL, COURIER
and REGULAR MAIL

Lobbyists Registrar for British Columbia
PO Box 9038
Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, B.C. V8W 9A4

Attention: Registrar Loukidelis

Re: Complaint under the Lobbyists Registration Act - OIPC File No. L08-35188

We are counsel to Mr. Kinsella, the principal of Progressive Holdings Ltd.

We understand that Leonard Krog, MLA, wrote to Registrar Loukidelis on June 5, 2008, asking him to investigate certain alleged lobbying activities respecting which Mr. Kinsella has not registered as a lobbyist. Mr. Kinsella has been advised that Ms. Carlson, Executive Director of the Lobbyists Registrar, is in the process of completing a preliminary analysis of the materials submitted by Mr. Krog, and will be informed by Ms. Carlson whether or not an investigation will be undertaken by the Registrar of Lobbyists.

We have reviewed the Lobbyists Registration Act, S.B.C. 2001, c. 42 ("Act"), and have determined that the Registrar of Lobbyists has no legislative or other power to accept complaints, or to conduct any investigation or reporting on the activities of individuals alleged to have contravened the Act. Accordingly, we are of the view that any investigations by the Registrar concerning the alleged lobbying activities of our client have no legal basis.

If the Registrar is of a contrary review, we would appreciate if you would provide us with a detailed explanation of the legal basis upon which this investigation is being conducted.

We are not foreclosing the possibility of cooperating with the Registrar in an investigation of our client's alleged lobbying activities. However, it is our position that any results of an investigation undertaken by the Registrar of Lobbyists, in the absence of legal authority for such an investigation, will be moot.

Yours truly,

Paul R. Cassidy

***

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Barristers & Solicitors
Patent & Trade-mark Agents
595 Burrard Street, P.O. Box 49314
Suite 2600, Three Bentall Centre
Vancouver BC V7X 1L3 Canada
Tel: 604-631-3300 Fax: 604-631-3309

September 3, 2008

VIA E-MAIL, COURIER
and REGULAR MAIL

Lobbyists Registrar for British Columbia
PO Box 9038
Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, B.C. V8W 9A4

Attention: Registrar Loukidelis

Dear Registrar Loukidelis

Re: Complaint under the Lobbyists Registration Act - OIPC File No. L08-35188

As we advised in our correspondence of September 3, 2008, we are counsel to Mr. Patrick Kinsella, the principal of Progressive Holdings Ltd.

Last night, we had the opportunity to attend the Canadian Bar Association British Columbia Branch meeting of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Law Section. In your keynote address, you said the following with respect to the authority of the Registrar of Lobbyists to conduct investigations regarding complaints you receive of alleged violations of the Lobbyists Registration Act, S.B.C. 2001, c. 42 ("Act"):

We [the Office of the Registrar] have undertaken a number of investigations depsite...with the consent of those whom we are investigating.

We agree with your statement as to the Registrar's lack of authority conduct any investigation or reporting on the activities of individuals alleged to have contravened the Act.

We hereby advise that Mr. Kinsella does not consent to any investigation or reporting by the Registrar of Lobbyists in respect of any such complaint(s) that may involve him.

Yours truly,

Paul R. Cassidy

***

BY FAX (604) 631-3309

October 2, 2008

Paul R. Cassidy
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Suite 2600
595 Burrard Street
Vancouver BC V7X 1L3

Dear Paul Cassidy

Complaint under the Lobbyists Registration Act - OIPC File Nos. L08-35188 & L08-35189 - your reference 97426/1

I have your September 26, 2008 letter and also have no seen your September 3, 2008 letter on the same issue. I am now directly involved and will respond as soon as practicable after reviewing this matter.

Copies of your September 3 and 26 letters are being sent to Leonard Krog with his copy of this letter.

Yours sincerely

David Loukidelis
Information & Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia
& Registrar of Lobbyists

copy: Leonard Krog MLA